Skip to main content

Hallucination Shield

Catch the fake citation before the court does.

Paste a brief or upload a PDF or Word file. Each citation is looked up, then read to check it supports your sentence. No sign-up.

No sign-up to check · Free plan, no card · Pro $149/mo

Representing yourself? Sign up free as pro se

Hallucination Shield

Check a brief free

Paste a brief or upload a PDF or Word file. Each citation is looked up, then read to check it supports your sentence. No sign-up.

Two checks on every citation

  1. Does the source exist?

    Looked up live: CaseRead’s public law database for statutes and regulations, the Free Law Project for case law.

    Cite foundCite not found

  2. Does it support your sentence?

    The source’s own text is read against the sentence it’s cited for. What can’t be confirmed is flagged for you to review.

    Claim supportedPossible misuse

A brief, a memo, or anything an AI tool wrote that cites cases or statutes.

0 / 50,000 characters

We check up to 50 citations per run. If your text has more, the ones past the 50th are not looked up — run the rest as a second check.

How it works

Two checks on every citation

1. Does the source exist?

Looked up live: CaseRead’s public law database for statutes and regulations, the Free Law Project for case law.

Cite foundCite not found

2. Does it support your sentence?

The source’s own text is read against the sentence it’s cited for. What can’t be confirmed is flagged for you to review.

Claim supportedPossible misuse

Up to 50 citations per check. An automated screen, not a citator.

Why check

Courts are finding fake citations.

  • May 22, 2025

    In Garner v. Kadince, 2025 UT App 80 (May 22, 2025), the Utah Court of Appeals sanctioned lawyers whose petition cited a case ChatGPT had invented, and noted that AI use in legal filings ‘has not been previously addressed by Utah courts.’

    Garner v. Kadince, 2025 UT App 80 (opinion, PDF)
  • Sept. 28, 2026

    Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database lists 2,095 cases worldwide in which a court or tribunal found or implied that a party relied on AI-hallucinated content (as of Sept. 28, 2026).

    AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin

Before you paste.

How the check works, what it costs, and where your text goes.

Want research that cites only what it actually found?

CaseRead research answers from authority its legal-database search returned: every citation links back to the source document, and anything it can’t ground there is flagged rather than asserted.

Free plan, no card · Pro $149/mo · Cancel anytime