Use cases · Litigation Attorneys
From the complaint to the brief, cited to the source
Research the motion with your own brief bank searched beside the law, review the production in bulk, and draft the brief in Word, with every citation checked before you file.
Lite $15/mo · Pro $149/mo · Cancel anytime
Project files
- Complaint.pdf
- Answer and defenses.pdf
- Prior MSJ brief (2024).docx
- Scheduling order.pdf
- Sep 5Dispositive motionsConfirmed
- Oct 20Final pretrial conferenceNeeds confirmation
Try it now
Ask what litigation attorneys ask
Pick a question. Each answer cites the statutes and cases it came from.
- FederalWhat is the summary judgment standard under FRCP 56?
- CaliforniaWhat must a motion to compel further discovery responses include in California state court?
- FederalWhen is a defense of lack of personal jurisdiction waived under FRCP 12(h)?
- 2nd Cir.What must a party show to get a preliminary injunction in the Second Circuit?
Each question opens CaseRead’s answer page, ready to ask. These are example questions, not answers.
Your workflow
Start to finish, in one place
Each step names the work and the part of CaseRead that does it.
Pleadings
Upload the complaint and ask what it alleges, count by count. Research the elements of each claim and the defenses to plead, cited to the statutes and cases.
CaseReadVault Q&A · cited researchMotion research
Ask for the standard, the burden and the procedural requirements. Your firm’s past briefs come up beside the law, so prior work feeds the new motion.
CaseReadResearch across the law and your brief bankDiscovery review
Put the production through bulk review for a memo per document and a cross-document findings memo, or tabular review to pull the same facts out of every document into one table.
CaseReadBulk review · tabular reviewDraft the brief
Draft the argument from the record and the authority you found, then edit in Word, where every AI change is a tracked change you accept or reject.
CaseReadAI drafting · Word add-inShield before you file
Every citation in the brief gets two checks: does the source exist, and does it support the sentence. What can’t be confirmed is flagged for you.
CaseReadHallucination ShieldDeadlines from the order
CaseRead lists the dates written in the scheduling order. Confirm each one and it goes to Google Calendar; it doesn’t calculate deadlines from court rules.
CaseReadCalendar → Google Calendar
Every answer links to the source it came from. Anything CaseRead can’t match to a source it retrieved is flagged, not asserted.
Capabilities
Tools for litigation attorneys
Your brief bank, searchable
Upload past briefs and memos. When you research a new issue, relevant sections from your own work come up beside the law.
Bulk review of a production
Review up to 12 documents in one run: a memo for each, plus a cross-document findings memo.
Tabular review
You define the columns; CaseRead fills one row per document, and every quoted answer is checked against the document itself.
Opposition brief.docxTracked changesDraft in Word, with tracked changes
The add-in drafts beside your document. In CaseRead’s own editor, every AI edit is a tracked change you accept or reject.
- Rule cited on p. 4Cite foundClaim supported
- Case cited on p. 6Cite foundClaim supported
- Case cited on p. 9Cite foundClaim supported
- Case cited on p. 11Cite not found
Check every citation in the brief
Paste the brief or upload it. Each citation is looked up, then read to check it supports your sentence.
- Searching public law (Federal)
- Searching the web
- Reading sources in full
- Shield: checking citations
Deep research for the hard question
Deep research searches longer and adds a web pass before it answers. It comes with Pro.
Recordings are from CaseRead. Illustrations show the layout, not real results.
Who it fits
How litigation attorneys put it to work
Solo litigators
Motion research, the brief and the cite check without a junior associate to hand them to.
Small litigation firms
On Team, share a case project so research, the brief bank and the production sit in one place.
Document-heavy commercial cases
Bulk and tabular review turn a production into memos and one comparable table.
Motion and appellate practice
Every citation in the brief checked for existence and support before it’s filed.
Why it is different
Generic AI tools vs CaseRead
Generic AI tools
- Cites cases from memory; some don’t exist.
- Can’t search your firm’s past briefs.
- Reads one document at a time, if you paste it.
- Leaves the cite check to you.
CaseRead
- Answers from authority the search actually returned, linked.
- Your brief bank and the law in one search, both cited.
- Bulk and tabular review across a set of documents.
- Two checks on every citation before you file.
Client files stay inside your firm. CaseRead gives every firm its own database schema, encrypts data in transit and at rest, and trains no AI model on what you upload.
How we protect client filesCommon questions from litigation attorneys
For firms of 5 or more
Rolling CaseRead out across a firm? We’ll set it up with you.
For firms of five or more attorneys, we start with a short call: your practice areas, who needs access, and the security questions your firm will ask.
- Shared projects and invite links for the whole team
- Two-factor sign-in a firm admin can require, and an activity log you can export
- A one-page security summary for your file
Start researching smarter today
Lite is $15 a month for 20 research questions a month, up to 4 a day, with a Hallucination Shield check on any answer.
Lite $15/mo · Pro $149/mo · Cancel anytime